2017 Kia Niro LX Hybrid Review & Redesign – The latest attack on the Prius originates from Kia, in whose Niro hybrid undercuts the Toyota in price, unfortunately, isn’t as effective. What the Niro brings to the progressively populated under-$30,000 hybrid sector is an exterior design that will revolt no one and a spacious interior. Following spending time with a 2017 Niro LX hybrid in the whole world, we had taken the crossover like the tall hatchback to the track, where its quickness impressed, but the car dropped short of the competition in another metric.
2017 Kia Niro LX Hybrid Review
The 2017 Kia Niro is only a hybrid for now, but in the years ahead, the automaker will provide a plug-in hybrid version, also. Those that want a plug-in Kia will no longer need to wait. The Optima plug-in hybrid is readily available but starts well above $30,000. That is where the 2017 Niro arrives in. With a base price of close to $24,000, the Kia is less expensive just before incentives which may shift based upon on location than the Toyota Prius, Ford C-Max, and each midsize sedan hybrid. The only hybrids carrying lower base prices are the new Hyundai Ionic Hybrid and the itty-bitty Toyota Prius C, but the former has the same hybridlike four-door hatchback form as the Prius, and the latter is slow and only delivers a rearview camera on the priciest models. Because crossovers are hotter at this time than sedans or hatchbacks, Kia is advertising the hybrid as a crossover although the car is lacking in an all-wheel-drive choice, and the Soul is more than 2 inches higher than the Niro. The Niro is also shorter in height than each player in our latest Large Examination evaluation of subcompact crossovers except the Mazda CX-3.
2017 Kia Niro LX Hybrid Feature
Had the not-a-crossover Niro hybrid competed in that test of subcompact crossovers, the Kia might have out-accelerated two-thirds of the field from to 60 mph while still being way more efficient than something individuals nonhybrids can provide. In Motor Trend tests, our 2017 Kia Niro LX hybrid quicker from to 60 mph in 8.7 seconds, or 1.0 second faster than a 2016 Prius we have examined and 1.2 seconds better than a 2016 Prius Eco but not quite as fast as a 2013 Ford C-Max, which attained 60 mph in 8.3 seconds. (The C-Max was renewed for 2017.) When compared with the regular Toyota Prius, the Niro hybrid is a bit heavier but additionally a lot more powerful, with its 104-hp 1.6-liter I-4 mated to a 43-hp electric motor excellent for a mixed-system 139 hp.
Fuel economy is one cause your car research isn’t centering on a Forte sedan or Sportage crossover, and the Niro is more efficient compared to individuals similarly priced Kia-not as thrifty on gas as the Prius. The base-model 2017 Niro FE is EPA-ranked at 52/49 mpg. Nevertheless, it lacks in the LX’s appealing LED taillights, SUV-ish roof side rails, and useful hands-free keyless accessibility for just $310 more. The 2017 Niro LX and EX are EPA-graded at 51/46 mpg, and when you want the extra equipment and 18-inch wheels of the Touring Release and Touring trims, the EPA ratings fall to 46/40 mpg. When it have been my cash, I’d skip the FE trim in spite of the added fuel economy and think about an LX without the deals to maximize the hybrid’s right combination of price range-warm and friendly price and people area, or I’d choose an EX in Rich Coffee fresh paint (unavailable on FE or LX) with a package that adds a sunroof, power driver’s seat, and active safety tech, such as a system that can utilize the braking systems to reduce the impact of a collision. If that technology appeals to you, understand that Toyota provides it as normal on every Prius, together with LED headlights. Based upon on your goals, which sets a base-model Prius and Niro LX on degree pricing ground if you have been planning to put the Niro LX’s Innovative Technology package.
Every 2017 Niro hybrid consists of a 7.0-inch touchscreen and Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, which means that you’ll have voice-order navigation anyplace your smartphone has reception. In which the cars aren’t degree is real-world or EPA fuel economy. The EPA-ranked 51/46 mpg of the Niro LX and EX is fantastic, but the 2017 Prius’ 54/50 mpg and Prius Eco’s 58/53 mpg are much better. After running all three of these cars using our Genuine MPG assessments, which include utilizing a $150,000 gas analyzer and driving every single car on an established path, the distinction in efficiency enlarges. The 2017 Niro LX performed nicely in city mileage, surpassing the EPA’s 51 mpg rating with 54.3 in Genuine MPG in our assessments. Highway mileage was 43.8 mpg (lower from the EPA’s 46 mpg). In assessment to the Niro LX’s 54.3/43.8 in Real MPG, a 2016 Prius Eco was excellent for 61.2/52.9, and a 2016 Prius in the Four trim was at 56.5/53.4. But maybe you can’t stay the new Prius’ styling or wish it experienced more rear headroom in that situation, examine the Niro LX to the Ford C-Max. Once we Real MPG analyzed a 2013 model, it transformed in a performance of 47.8/43.2, significantly less than the Niro LX’s city ranking in Actual MPG but about the very same on the highway.
On the road, the Niro can feel quicker than the Prius, and Kia’s six-speed dual clutch transmission ought to help the hybrid-averse feel more comfortable driving it. However, I privately choose the smoothness of a CVT. The Niro’s dual-clutch transmission is receptive except for full-throttle jobs and occasions when you go for the gas right after visiting a stop, but each circumstance is likely rare occurrences in a car these kinds of as the Niro. If you desire to enhance the Niro’s real 0-60-mph performance with the impression of quickness, drive the car in Sports mode. More regularly, you’ll be fine with the car’s standard Eco mode and enjoy smooth transitions from EV to gas power. Based on a couple of assessments when I was the only one on the road, hypermilers might be impressed by how you can practically increase at a normal pace from a stoplight on EV power on your own, depending on the charge status of the 1.56-kW-hr lithium-ion polymer battery power.
The regenerative brakes require a bit of a modification for motorists new to hybrids but no more than every other hybrid. Braking performance at the track, which simulates real-world panic braking, had not been excellent. The 2017 Niro LX discontinued from 60 mph in 134 feet, which tumbles below a 2016 Prius Four Touring’s 115 feet, a 2016 Prius Eco’s 119 feet, and a 2017 Ford Fusion Hybrid’s 123 feet. Most Niro’s roll on 16-inch wheels and P205/60R16 tires, but it’s achievable the Touring’s P225/45R18s will help a bit in this article. The wheels on the Niro LX are fuel-economy concentrated, and they also don’t hesitate to communicate that and everything else to the motorist and travelers on the highway. There’s a good sum of road noise, but a minimum of the trip is much less bouncy than Motor Trend’s long-term 2017 Sportage. Move to the rear seat, and there is area to stretch out. Like the door sections, the backside of the front seats are tight, but that nearly doesn’t issue due to the fact there is so much legroom. The drivetrain hump in the center of the rear footwell is almost smooth, which also improves the impact of space, and there is plenty of headroom. So there is room inside for passengers, but the NIro’s cargo location can only fit 19.4 cubic feet of information. That is not bad, but the Hyundai Ionic Hybrid comes in at 26.5 cubic feet, the Prius at 24.6-27.4 cubic feet based on the trim, and the Ford C-Max hybrid at 24.5 cubic feet. Sit in the rear seat of an Ionic or Prius, and you’ll understand why some may give up a couple of mpg for a more friendly room for back travelers.
The 2017 Niro’s tire strain tracking system has individual readouts for every tire, so you never need to guess which one is lower a couple of PSI. The Niro’s numerous hybrid displays consist of a plant whose leaves steadily put or drop color (white and shades of blue) centered on your driving practices. There is also a power Stream diagram in the tool bunch and on the key touchscreen, a minute-by-minute fuel economy graph, and a Charge/Eco/Power meter (and EV light that shows when you are not making use of the gas engine), which replaces what could have been a tachometer in the instrument cluster. There is even a high setting in the device group’s 4.2-inch info screen that reveals the portion of your driving in three categories: Economic, Regular, and Aggressive. It is an excellent package of details for hybrid users who would like to track their driving, but Ford has the edge in this group in the terminology of visuals and range of information exhibited.
If you are considering a Niro hybrid, you also need to drive the Prius, the Ford C-Max, and the Hyundai Ionic, which offers its powertrain with the Niro. If you’re looking to steer clear of the streamlined hatchback appear many relate with hybrids, nonetheless, you’re as a result of the Ford and Kia if the Prius V wagon’s base price of around $27,500 is excessive. Equally the C-Max and Niro hybrids are easier than the regular Prius, but the Kia beats the Ford in Real MPG city mileage and costs about $1,000 much less, just before adding in community incentives, which can entirely change that picture. The latest C-Max may be more fulfilling to drive than the Kia, who battles back again with a better original warranty of five years/60,000 miles.
The Niro hybrid is not a standout performer, but there is value in its rates, and there is lots of area for your Uber or Lyft passengers. When you can value the Niro’s for a longer time driving range and quiet city procedure, Kia finally has anything to offer buyers who do not want the segment’s most grand entrance: the Prius.